Back to Table of Contents
44979-G5
Studying Monolayer Formation on Alloys
Ellen Gawalt, Duquesne University
In this 2008 reporting period we have made
progress on investigating the metal oxide-organic interaction on stainless
steel 316L and its component oxides by working on the two goals of the
proposal: 1. forming organic monolayers on the surface and varying the organic head
group pKa from acidic to basic to determine if
acidity of the head group is the controlling factor in reactivity; 2. studying
the surface metal role in monolayer formation and stability by using the alloy
and its individual components.
Goal 1: Prior to this reporting period we had successfully formed monolayers on the oxide surface of SS316L using octadecylcarboxylic acid and octadecylphosphonic
acid and attempted to form monolayers using amines,
alcohols and alkanes. In this reporting period we
have attempted monolayer formation with hydroxamic (pKa = 8) and sulfonic acids (pKa = 2). All attempted surface modifications were analyzed
by diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy. If modification was successful,
the substrates were rinsed in the deposition solvent and sonicated
to test the chemical and mechanical stability of the monolayer. Films stable to
these tests were then analyzed by AFM and MALDI-TOF MS.
Octadecylhydroxamic acid formed
ordered films upon deposition that were stable to rinsing (νCH2 asymm = 2916 cm-1). By AFM, it was
concluded that the films were made up of micelles that were easily removed
through sonication. The deposition of sulfonic acids has led to weakly bound multilayers
(νCH2 asymm = 2913 cm-1;
AFM indicates multilayer). The films were stable to rinsing but not sonciation in THF (Table 1). The reactivity of the organics to SS316L
substrate is, thus far, found to follow the order: phosphonic
acid > carboxylic acid > hydroxamic acid = sulfonic acid> amine > alcohol > alkane. This is not consistent with increasing reactivity
with increasing pKa due to the low stability of the sulfonic acid system. The sulfonic
acid head group is larger than the other head groups which may hinder packing
of the film and therefore stability of the film. Additionally, the deprotonated form of sulfonic
acid, which is thought to be the reactive species in monolayer formation, is
stabilized due to the delocalization of the charge by resonance, potentially
rendering the acid less reactive. Additionally, both the phosphonic
and carboxylic acids are bound to the surface in a bidentate
manner, while the hydroxamic and sulfonic
acids are in a monodentate orientation after rinsing.
Goal 2: The surface of SS316L is composed of oxides of the following
metals: Fe 66.01%, Cr 19.19 %, Ni 9.17%, Mn 3.22% and
Mo 2.42%. To determine the role of the surface components in monolayer
formation we used each metal oxide as a substrate for monolayer formation. The
results are summarized in Table 1. Monolayer formation with octadecylphosphonic
acid was straightforward on all of the substrates, while carboxylic acid only
formed monolayers on iron and molybdenum oxides and
was only stable to rinse on iron.
Interestingly, these unreactive surface species
do not prohibit formation of a complete monolayer of carboxylic acids on
SS316L. The monolayers have been characterized by
infrared spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and MALDI-TOF MS. The mass
spectrometry data confirms the IR data presented here. Contact angle measurements
are presented in Table 2.
ACIDS | Phosphonic acid | Carboxylic acid | Hydroxamic acid | Sulfonic acid |
Metals | Rinse | Sonic | Rinse | Sonic | Rinse | Sonic | Rinse | Sonic |
SS 316L | 2912 | 2911 | 2915 | 2917 | 2916 | ----- | 2913 | ---- |
Nickel | 2914 | 2915 | ---- | ---- | 2916 | ----- | 2918 | ---- |
Iron | 2915 | 2916 | 2915 | 2915 | ---- | ----- | 2916 | ----- |
Chromium | 2914 | 2914 | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | 2915 | ----- |
Molybdenum | 2914 | 2914 | ----- | ----- | 2913 | 2913 | 2914 | ----- |
Manganese | 2914 | 2914 | ---- | ----- | 2914 | ----- | 2914 | ---- |
Table 1.
Value of the peak
assigned to the asymmetric stretching of the methylene
region (cm-1) which is correlated to film order (<2918 cm-1)
and disorder (>2920 cm-1). (Rinse = IR value after rinsing substrate in
THF; Sonic = IR value after sonication in THF).
ACIDS | Phosphonic acid | Carboxylic acid | Hydroxamic acid | Sulfonic acid |
Metals | θ ° | + Stdev | θ ° | + Stdev | θ ° | + Stdev | θ ° | + Stdev |
SS 316L | 108 | 3 | 104 | 1 | 76 | 9 | 90 | 4 |
Nickel | 109 | 5 | ---- | ---- | 100 | 4 | 93 | 8 |
Iron | 98 | 4 | 87 | 5 | ---- | ---- | 83 | 10 |
Chromium | 99 | 8 | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | 17 | 6 |
Molybdenum | 80 | 8 | ---- | ---- | 22 | 9 | 31 | 7 |
Manganese | 58 | 7 | ---- | ---- | 68 | 13 | 101 | 6 |
Table 2. Static water
contact angles on modified substrates with standard deviations.
In the extension reporting period, the group plans to explore
fundamental surface reasons (such as isoelectric point,
grain boundaries, etc) for the differences in reactivity between the alloy and
its substituents and explore experimental changes to
enhance the stability of sulfonic acid films on the
surface. Additionally, chain length effects of the acids on monolayer formation
and stability.
Back to top