ACS PRF | ACS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45215-AC10
|
Sample ID | Major TiO2 Phase | Mode of Formation | Temperature (°C) | Solvent | HCl concentration(M) | Time (hr) |
WACS | Brookite | WACS | 83 | 2:1 IPA:water | 0.3 | 15 |
WACS-200 | Brookite | Calcination of WACS | 200 | - | - | 2 |
SACS* | Brookite | SACS | * | * | - | * |
SACS-200 | Brookite | Calcination of SACS | 200 | - | - |
|
P25 | Anatase | Obtained from Degussa | N/A | - | - | 2
|
*U.S. Patent applied & info withheld.
1.1.2 Characterizations
All samples were characterized by N2 Adsorption and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). The photocatalytic activities were evaluated by the degradation of the methyl orange (MO) under UV irradiation. The characterization and photocatalytic activity test conditions were reported in the publications from our group [2-4].
1.2 Results
The X-ray diffraction patterns of the TiO2 particles are shown in Figure 2. The TiO2 phase of uncalcined WACS and SACS samples is predominantly brookite. Calcined titania samples at 200oC for 2 hours had a small portion of rutile in the structure. The crystallite sizes calculated from the XRD data as reported in Table 2 are approximately 16 nm which is much smaller than the P25 crystalline size.
The results of BET surface area, pore volume, and average pore diameter of titania samples are given in Table 2. The BET surface area of our brookite titania samples were three times larger than that of P25 samples. The photocatalytic activities of brookite titania samples compared to P25 samples, determined by the methyl orange degradation, are shown in Figure 3. The degradation by the uncalcined samples is significantly slower than those samples calcined at 200°C for 2 hours, due to the removal of surface hydroxyls and/or organic. The photocatalytic activities, obtained by MO degradation, of the calcined brookite titania samples, WACS-200 and SACS-200, are much better than the commercial P25 sample. A few papers from our group [2,4] reported that our brookite titania is more photocatalytically active than P25. The orange color of MO for SACS-200 was degraded ten minutes faster than that of WACS-200 (*further info withheld). This is supported by data obtained from FTIR and 1H NMR analysis and the measured pore volume of samples. The SACS brookite titania paper was submitted to catalysis letters journal in August 2007.
The antibacterial properties were obtained from collaboration with Biological Sciences Department, Clemson University. UV light activated brookite titania on Escherichia coli 23848 killed all bacteria within 120 minutes, but P25 did not [6].
Figure 2. The XRD pattern of the brookite titania samples
Table 2. The physical properties of prepared titania samples and the reference P25.
Sample ID | Crystalline size (nm)* | BET surface area (m²/g) | Pore Volume (cm³/g) | Pore size average (Å) | ||
Brookite | Anatase | Rutile | ||||
WACS | 14 | - | - | 163 | 0.1 | 25 |
WACS-200 | 18 | - | - | 157 | 0.1 | 27 |
SACS | 12 | - | - | 197 | 0.1 | 28 |
SACS-200 | 13 | - | - | 202 | 0.2 | 30 |
P25 | - | 21 | 40 | 56 | 0.2 | 169 |
* calculated from XRD data using the Scherrer equation
Figure3. Methyl orange degradation of brookite titania samples compared to commercial P25.
2.0 Conclusions
Up to now, we can conclude that brookite titania is photocatalytically and antimicrobially superior to P25. Solvothermal treatment technique enhanced the photocatalytic properties of brookite titania. We found that our brookite titania has potential to be active under visible light. The future work will focus more on doped titania to improve visible light photoactivation.
3.0 References
[1] B.I. Lee, X. Wang, R. Bhave and M. Hu, Mater. Lett. 60 (2006) 1179.
[2] C.A. Nolph, D.E. Sievers, S. Kaewgun, C.J. Kucera, D.H. McKinney, J.P. Rienties, J.L. White, R. Bhave and B.I. Lee, Catal. lett. 117 (2007) 102.
[3] R.C. Bhave and B.I. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 467 (2007) 146.
[4] R.C. Bhave, C.A. Nolph, S. Kaewgun and B.I. Lee, Catal. Comm. (2007).
[5] L. Qi, B.I. Lee, P. Badhekaa, L. Wang, P. Gilmourc, W.D. Samuels and G.J. Exarhos, Mater. Lett. 59 (2005) 2794.
[6] R.R. Shah, Masters Dissertation, Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University (2007).