Palladium catalysts supported on
nanoparticle alumina [nano-Al2O3(+), surface area (SA):
695 m2/g] have been prepared using two different methods of
depositing the active metal onto the support, namely wet impregnation and
precipitation. The prepared nanoparticle-supported catalysts have been tested
for activity in the coupling reaction of 4-methylpyridine to
4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine and their activities compared with two
commercially available catalysts (Pd/C and Pd/Al2O3), as
well as catalysts prepared using precipitation onto a conventional alumina
support and a second nanoparticle alumina support [nano-Al2O3(-),
SA: 275 m2/g]. Previous results have indicated that Pd/C is one of
the most efficient catalysts, even though the yields may vary somewhat, and
that palladium supported on alumina is a poor catalyst in this reaction. This
is indeed the behavior observed in Table 1, Rows 1-3. Our results indicate
that the palladium supported on the nanoparticle alumina is in fact a very
active catalyst, but the activity is dependent on the preparation method.
While the impregnated catalyst performs poorly, the catalyst prepared via
precipitation gives the highest yield observed to date for this reaction system
(Table 1, Rows 4 and 5). Despite the fact that Pd/Al2O3
catalysts are known to be poor catalysts in this reaction the precipitated Pd/nano-Al2O3(+)
performs better than the commonly used commercial Pd/C catalyst (compare Rows 5
and 2). However, the catalytic activity is very dependent on the nature of the
alumina support. While a catalyst prepared using another nanoparticle alumina with
larger particle sizes [nano-Al2O3(-), surface area 275 m2/g]
did not have a significant activity, a commercial bimodal gamma-Al2O3
support (surface area: 260 m2/g) can result in an active catalyst if
prepared via the precipitation method (Table 1). However, the yields obtained
from Pd/bimodal-gamma-Al2O3 are lower and less
reproducible compared to the best performing catalyst, Pd/nano-Al2O3(+).
Palladium surface area measurements indicate that while the catalytic activity
appears to correlate with the palladium surface area on Pd/C and the
precipitated Pd/nano-Al2O3(+), this is not the case for
the impregnated Pd/nano-Al2O3(+) and the commercial Pd/Al2O3
(see Table 1). The activities of the impregnated Pd/nano-Al2O3(+)
and the commercial Pd/Al2O3 catalysts are lower than what
would be expected for the corresponding palladium surface areas. Preliminary
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements indicate that the fresh commercial
Pd/Al2O3 is not active due to a lower PdO content
compared with fresh Pd/C. The XPS corroborate a higher palladium dispersion of
the precipitated versus the impregnated Pd/nano-Al2O3(+)
catalysts. However, apart from this and the presence of residual Na (from the
precipitation base), there are no other evident differences between the two
catalysts in the XPS spectra. A more detailed investigation is necessary to
explain the observed differences between the catalyst activities.
Although it is possible
that a palladium species in solution is the catalytically active species, our
experiments indicate that presence of a heterogeneous catalyst is necessary for
the reaction to proceed. A reaction mixture that was filtered hot after 24 hours
and then brought back to reflux without the solid catalyst for an additional 72
hours did not form any more product than what is expected from a 24-hour run.
The recovered catalyst (after the 24-hour experiment) is active, but the
activity is considerably lower than that of the original catalyst. The
experiments also indicated that the quality of the reactant, the
4-methylpyridine, is important for the reaction. It is necessary to distil the
4-methylpyridine over KOH in order to obtain the highest yields.
Initial tests have also been
performed on a few other nanoparticle oxide supports, TiO2, ZnO, Al(OH)3, CaO, and Ce-doped ZrO2 [ZrO2(Ce)].
The results are summarized in Table 1.
Raw Pd Yield
Catalyst
Description a Product Surface [g/g
Yield Area Surface
[g/g
Pd] b [m2/g] Pd]
5%
Pd/C Commercial 16 5.2 71
5%
Pd/C Commercial 36 5.2 155
5%
Pd/Al2O3 Commercial 2.5 c 2.2 (25)
5%
Pd Imp, on nano-Al2O3(+) 4 3.0 29
5%
Pd Prec. on nano-Al2O3(+) 53 7.6 152
5%
Pd Prec. on nano-Al2O3(+) 52
- -
5%
Pd Prec. on nano-Al2O3(-) 6 0.6 230
5%
Pd Prec. on com-Al2O3(BM) 24 1.3 399
5%
Pd Prec. on com-Al2O3(BM) 34 - -
5%
Pd Prec. on nano-TiO2 31 -
-
5%
Pd Prec. on nano-ZnO 40 -
-
5%
Pd Prec. on nano-Al(OH)3 26 -
-
5%
Pd Prec. on nano-CaO 3 -
-
5% Pd Prec. on nano-ZrO2(Ce) 58
- -
a Imp.:
Impregnated, Prec. Precipitated, nano-Al2O3(+):
nanoparticle alumina (NanoActive Aluminum Oxide Plus), nano-Al2O3(-):
nanoparticle alumina (NanoActive Aluminum Oxide), com-Al2O3(BM):
commercial bimodal gamma-Al2O3.
b Product: 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine. Raw yield
contains a small amount of the terpyridine byproduct:
4,4',4”-trimethyl-2,2',6'2”-terpyridine as the only byproduct.
c There was very little 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine
product in this run. The solids recovered appear to be mostly catalyst and
organic byproducts.