|
Neither
slave nor free
Americans pouring into the newly purchased Louisiana Territory encountered
a social caste virtually unknown in the Eastern seaboard States: gens
de couleur libre, free people of color. In the early years of the
nineteenth century, free blacks comprised 25 percent of the population
of New Orleans, far higher than in most other areas of the American South,
where nearly all blacks were slaves.
The number of free blacks in New Orleans was due in part to the French
and Spanish heritage of Louisiana. Both France and Spain had lenient manumission
policies and both encouraged slaves to purchase their freedom. But the
majority of free blacks resulted from sexual relations between white men
and black women. One Spanish bishop lamented, "a good many inhabitants
live almost publicly with colored concubines" and they consider the
issue of such liaisons "as their natural children." Finally,
the ranks of the gens de couleur libre swelled in the early years
of American control of New Orleans with the influx of thousands of light-skinned
freemen fleeing the internecine warfare in the new black Republic of Haiti.
In the eighteenth century, Louisiana free blacks enjoyed a higher social
status and had more rights than the small free black population of the
English colonies. Their condition would deteriorate under American control,
but it remained true that free blacks maintained a privileged status in
the antebellum years. As late as 1856, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled
that under Louisiana law there is "all the difference between a free
man of color and a slave, that there is between a white man and a slave."
Indeed, a few free blacks even belonged to the planter class, owning slaves
themselves.
In nineteenth century New Orleans, as in the years of French and Spanish
rule, relationships between white men and black women were common. Harriet
Martineau, the noted English novelist, social critic, and traveler, expressed
shock at New Orleans social mores: "The quadroon girls of New
Orleans are brought up by their mothers to be what they have been, the
mistresses of white gentlemen." Martineau noted that many of the
sons were sent to France, as was Norbert Rillieux.
In many cases, white men and "free women of color" formed strong
attachments and, as Frederick Law Olmsted, the famous landscape architect
who visited New Orleans in the 1850s, noted: "The arrangement is
never discontinued, but becomes, indeed, that of marriage, except that
it is not legalized nor solemnized." Such appears to have been the
case with Victor Rillieux, who never married, and Constance Vivant. But
Olmsted also wrote of the alienation of "the class composed of the
illegitimate offspring of white men and colored women (mulattoes or quadroons),
who, from habits of early life, the advantages of education, and the use
of wealth, are too much superior to the negroes, in general, to associate
with them, and are not allowed by law, or the popular prejudice to marry
white people."
This was the world of Norbert Rillieux, a world in which the large caste
of "free people of color" had rights intermediate between slaves
and whites. They were, in other words, neither slave nor free.
|
|
|